|
SB: So you are coming
from two different worlds, the one you have just described and then the
world of Photoshop and digital imaging.
JV: Yes, and though
it seems that they are very different they are similar in sensibility.
Our role as human beings is to protect the natural world instead of seeing
it as a resource. I see the planet as a guardian of that resource. I admired
that in Ansel Adams and I see him as a person who was absolutely awed
by the majestic beauty of what he saw. No, he is not my hero, but I like
his attitude toward nature and his need to guard the fragility and the
beauty--it was a union. In my own work I want to show people beautiful
places that are not buried under cement and make it known that we must
protect these places.
SB: Adams and Weston,
too, made powerful images of nature but they were crisp. Yours in contrast
are filmy, atmospheric, grainier, and more painterly.
JV: I use a little
bit of push and pull, too, in the development, depending on the highlights
and the infrared film. I don't want to blow my highlights out and it's
easy to do. I use Formulary black and white 130 developer out of Montana.
It's based on the old Amidol photographic recipes, but is not as toxic.
Then I print on beautiful art paper, either Bergger or Forte, because
of their high content of silver.
SB: And even with your
expertise, you feel that this same quality cannot be achieved working
in Photoshop?
JV: No. I don't think
the resolution on the paper can really handle the subtleties and tonal
separations in the gray scale of my infrared yet. The printers are not
capable and those that are do not have the archival quality. The technology
is not quite there.
SB: I find that all
of your work addresses something more than just the material plane. It
seems more spiritual and revealing.
JV: Well, thank you.
I do try to lift a veil of reality so it is beyond the human struggle.
It is the moment though--I think more in terms of union, some kind of
a connection I feel. A photojournalist may also connect with his or her
images, project on to them or feel the story to be told. There is an agenda.
I guess what I am saying about my own work is that when I photograph I
am trying to be in a meditative state (not that I want to sound like a
new age freak) where I have a psychological connection to where I am.
I try to resonate with the energy in that place. I honestly feel there
is a living energy in nature and when I go to these special places I always
hope to capture it.
SB: I know that you
have been teaching workshops in Photoshop. Will you give us a little more
information about your own digital procedures?
JV: My new work is using
digital, though it is camera based. Many images are taken in 21/4" format,
scanned into the computer and digitized in Photoshop. Though it seems
I am working backward, the output is put on CD and made back into film
so I can print it on top of a birch board that has a silver liquid emulsion.
I re-expose the image on these 30" square panels and then oil glaze on
top of them. I use the birch panels because they hold up better during
all the chemical processes. I use a lot of medium in my mixture, and paper
would disintegrate so the photographs are more archival. I have a vague
concept ahead of time of an idea I want to make into a piece and at times
they almost turn into paintings. Sometimes a part of the photograph will
get completely covered while other parts remain untouched. It's a marriage,
and when people ask is this a photograph or a painting--well, that is
music to my ears.
|